[LAU] Netjack questions

Arnold Krille arnold at arnoldarts.de
Mon Jan 12 23:25:55 UTC 2015


On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:10:09 -0800 Russell Hanaghan
<hanaghan.osaudio at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a resident position at a local live venue haunt doing live
> sound. Nothing super fancy but we get a great variety of quality acts
> thru there.
> 
> I need some more returns to the stage. Probably 2 for live monitors
> and maybe a cpl for I  ear mixes. Rather than going for wired
> solutions, could u get the latency low enough on netjack to not be a
> nuisance over wireless? I could also run a single cat 5e or 6 and gig
> ports too I suppose. Easier than running 4 + shielded pair in this
> particular instance. Have several older laptops laying about. 

Isn't cat 5e "just" 4 shielded pairs? Might be worth a try to do a RJ45
to XLR stagebox ;-)

Other than that I wouldn't go the wireless route, shared medium is
always asking for extra trouble. Especially when you have an audience
of mobiles searching for the next wireless to connect to.

- Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20150113/54327c4b/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list