[LAU] Is there a newer, better "Jack Rack"?

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 03:55:38 +0100, Hermann Meyer wrote:
>Given the licence a other name wouldn't change that fact, as it is 
>simply not compatible with the DFSG, regardless how you name it.

"Packages must be placed in non-free, if they are not compliant with the
DFSG", see:

On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 21:25:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html

It's politic, GNU has got a spirit and Debian's Linux port is hardcore
GNU/Linux, but e.g. Ubuntu PPAs and the Arch user repository are not
that tricky regarding the policy. While the Arch user repository
usually doesn't cause issues for Arch users, since Arch is not
user-friendly, but user-centric, an Ubuntu PPA could cause serious
issues for the averaged Ubuntu user, who expects a user-friendly
approach.

Regards,
Ralf