[LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

[Jeremy Carter]

The argument against this seems to be basically, it can't happen because
people have differing financial interests in having their own proprietary
solution which they want to keep private.

But this is not the proprietary world here, this is the world of open
source. So what's the problem with doing it anyway? Maybe it takes off and
maybe even gets used eventually in proprietary stuff (if that's what you
want)

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu at teksavvy.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:00:04 -0400
> Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, the plugin (and DAW and audio technology worlds) simply haven't
> > worked that way in a long time, if ever.
> >
> > We never even managed to agree on a way to share a tempo map in
> > JACK ... you think it is somehow easier to agree on how to share
> > "this is what i think the current spectral energy of my track looks
> > like?"
>
> No-one says it's easy.  Just looking at the extremely basic discussion
> here, and the circonvolutions thereof, we can easily (and this is the
> easy part) foresee that the effort would be of Gargantuan proportions :)
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20161018/0b61a536/attachment-0001.html>