[LAU] The future of audio plugins ?

[Robert Edge]

I think that may or may not be useful, depending on how well it works.

Declaring such a thing 'THE FUTURE OF AUDIO PLUGINS' and worrying about a
standardized protocol is goofy as hell.

The OP seems very resistant to the idea of actually doing something, but
insists that this is THE WAY FORWARD.

That's why people are not taking the discussion seriously.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons at linuxaudio.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:25:26PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > The audio engineer with the promotionally effective name demands
> > another audio engineer for this kind of assistance. IOW a human does
> > the mix and another human does the fine tuning. This is quasi the
> > counterpart of what Fons already mentioned. Let iZotope's Track
> > Assitant/Neutron do the mix, then use iZotope's Track Assitant/Neutron
> > to do the fine tuning of the mix it produced before.
>
> I spent most the evening with a group a sound engineers, discussing
> things ranging from mixing desk ergonomics to how to approach a
> particular mix that our host presented as an example of his work.
>
> Inspired by this thread, I dared to coin the question 'how would
> you feel about an EQ plugin that analyses the track it's in, gets
> information from its peers in other tracks, and then adjusts itself ?'
>
> Result: general hilarity. Consensus was that this the most stupid
> thing ever suggested. Had to take some action to avoid damage to
> my own reputation.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20161019/e0892193/attachment.html>