[LAU] Close, but no cigar

[Will Godfrey]

On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:01:05 +0200
Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de> wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:56:46 +0200 Ralf Mardorf
> <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:22 -1000, David Jones wrote:  
> > > On Mar 31, 2017 22:12, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>
> > > wrote:  
> > > >   
> > > > > On 01 Apr 2017, at 01:22, Jeanette C.
> > > > > <julien at mail.uni-paderborn.de> wrote: I started thinking, it
> > > > > wasn't that time of year, but then I noticed that it actually
> > > > > is.   
> > > > 
> > > > A filter rule to move mails from this particular date to a
> > > > special folder (Krusty folder) doesn't harm ;). This might work
> > > > with a filter rule based on physics. Since this date does cause
> > > > some kind of intellectual vacuum, the Casimir effect should work
> > > > to move those mails to the Krusty folder.  
> > > 
> > > I think I'd recommend moving them to /dev/blackhole instead. :)  
> > 
> > Then another you or me in a parallel universe would receive duplicated
> > messages, respl. all of us would receive multiple messages, if this
> > would be done by several you or me. We would get rid of the messages
> > from our universe, but receive several new from the multiverse. Let
> > alone that feedback might be possible, if so, we actually would
> > receive an endless amount of the original emails we moved
> > to /dev/blackhole. Such blackhole loops could be misused for advanced
> > DDoS or e-mail chain letters.  
> 
> Multiverse Blackhole Distributed Denial of Service!
> 
> Now that is something to save for the future! Btw, do we know _when_
> these messages would be released by the blackhole? Maybe with the right
> energy we can make these messages reappear in a year?

Actually, I think I got some of these 5 years ago.
They were dated 22/2/2222

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.