[LAU] reducing xruns (System configuration)

[David Kastrup]

Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> writes:

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 02:23:40 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>How do real people on real mailing lists, let's say a developer list,
>>do this?
>
> However, you are just trolling, since you even claim that it is an open
> mailing list, while this list explicitly mentions, that it isn't, again:
>
> "Your message has been rejected, probably because you are not
> subscribed to the mailing list and the list's policy is to prohibit
> non-members from posting to it."

Not on its list page.  There is asks people to just post to the list.

> It's also no a developers mailing list.
>
> You are completely wrong!
>
> Instead of continuing this off-topic, consider to provide the missing
> information I requested by this:
>
> "Hi,
>
> the OP on Wed, 2018-07-18 at 21:28 +0200 wrote "64 buffer size at 48kHz
> 2 Periods/Buffer" and the OP on Thu, 2018-07-19 at 14:32 +0200 wrote
> "Bus 003 Device 002: ID 08bb:29c2 Texas Instruments PCM2902C Audio
> CODEC".
>
> I'm not aware that a lot of people got this to work at all.

Here is some discussion about comparable latencies (at 96kHz):

https://forum.renoise.com/index.php/topic/46412-low-latency-and-xrun-optimizations-on-linux/

-- 
David Kastrup