[LAU] Off-topic: "A look at how the Behringer Model D compares with the Minimoog"

Paul Davis paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
Mon Jun 18 16:46:06 CEST 2018


this is more audiophile-level woo.

virtually nobody alive can tell the difference between a good digital
recording and an analog one. those who think they can will rarely (if ever)
agree to double blind testing.

there can certainly be things about analog equipment that are hard or
impossible to capture with a digital equivalent.

but to claim that the recording process is the source of audible
differences? even if this might have been true of the earliest days of
commercial digital recording, it isn't true anymore.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:50 AM, robertlazarski <robertlazarski at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Felix Homann <linuxaudio at showlabor.de>
> wrote:
>
>> No matter how close  the Behringer Model D actually gets to the Minimoog
>> - and it seems to get very close - it is a great mono synth. Even more so
>> for the price. I've been having quite some fun with it for some months now
>> :-)
>>
>> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> schrieb am Mo., 18. Juni 2018
>> um 07:07 Uhr:
>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYxc8R_Qys0
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>>> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
>>> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
>> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>
>>
> I have the reissue D from Moog, and in general lots of Moog products and
> zero from Behringer so from that perspective ...
>
> I find the idea of comparing a digitally recorded analog synth to another
> digitally recorded analog synth to be a flawed way of looking at things. I
> couldn't tell a digital piano recording, from a real Steinway recording
> neither though piano is my main instrument.
>
> However imho, the magic of analog synths, compressors, eq, effects, and
> real piano comes alive before hitting the converters. After the converters
> so much is lost.
>
> IOW a double blind test of two of these synths in the same room before the
> converters, is the only way I would try to compare these things. Like in a
> music shop back in the day.
>
> I may be snowflake, but after many years of collecting gear and moving it
> across continents a few times as a former expat I find build quality to be
> of utmost importance. I bought a $600 road case for the D, and since the
> originals from the 70's still are in high demand I expect the same from the
> Moog reissue. The new Behringer longevity is TBD. Life is too short for me
> to go down the Behringer path ymmv.
>
> That being said, I have no doubt the Behringer D is a huge step up from
> the plugins - best I can tell that is good enough reason to buy things for
> most people.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-user/attachments/20180618/c07ca766/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list