<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I can confirm that the application successfully connects and is
able to control and monitor the interface, which is a big success!
Thanks for letting me know about it. :)</p>
<p>Brandon Hale<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/14/22 11:34 AM, Dragan Noveski
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:trinity-38449716-99ee-4eb7-b119-f6238783f12c-1655220895923@msvc-mesg-gmx126">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="mail_android_message" style="line-height: 1; padding:
0.5em">Sure, it would be great if you can test it and do a small
report here.<br>
<br>
Cheers! </div>
<div class="mail_android_quote" style="line-height: 1; padding:
0.3em">Am 14.06.2022, 15:59 schrieb Brandon Hale
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bthaleproductions@gmail.com"><bthaleproductions@gmail.com></a>:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0.8ex 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<p>Hey, I didn't know about that! That's awesome. I can try it
out and see if it works if anyone is interested.</p>
<p>Brandon Hale<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"> On 6/14/22 9:50 AM, Dragan
Noveski wrote: <br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div class="mail_android_message" style="line-height: 1;
padding: 0.5em"> Hello, what about the Tascam-Gtk
application? What I was able to find in the www, is that
it should do the trick. Has anyone have any experience
with that one? <br>
<br>
Cheers! </div>
<div class="mail_android_quote" style="line-height: 1;
padding: 0.3em"> Am 14.06.2022, 15:25 schrieb Brandon Hale
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:bthaleproductions@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true"><bthaleproductions@gmail.com></a>:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0.8ex 0pt
0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;"> Hey Jeanette, <br>
<br>
I wanted to tell you my experience with the Tascam
US-16x08 on Linux. <br>
First off, it works and shows up under alsa. You get the
inputs and <br>
outputs which is really nice. <br>
<br>
Now for the downside: it has its own proprietary
software that doesn't <br>
exist on Linux for digital processing and mixing.
Basically, the <br>
interface has its own mixing utility that also allows
one to apply <br>
limited dsp effects and mix/route audio. If you wanted
to stay solely on <br>
Linux, this cannot be used. <br>
<br>
Now, if you buy the interface and it has a clean slate
for its digital <br>
mixing/processing state, it may work just fine for your
needs. But, if <br>
you buy it used, you may have to change it to that
clean/stock slate first. <br>
<br>
Let me know if you have any questions about the Tascam
US-16x08, as it <br>
literally is sitting next to me at work and I can just
plug it in and <br>
try out things for you when I have free time. <br>
<br>
Brandon Hale <br>
<br>
On 6/12/22 4:57 PM, Jeanette C. wrote: <br>
> Hey hey, <br>
> my two old Delta 1010 cards are definitely dying
now. So I need <br>
> replacement for all those analog I/Os. I have found
three candidates: <br>
> Behringer X Air XR18, Presonus ARC16C and Tascam
u16x08(?) and would <br>
> be glad if anyone could share experiences with them
under Linux. I'm <br>
> also looking for further alternatives (see my
minimum requirements <br>
> below). I definitely need multichannel audio coming
from the device. <br>
> <br>
> The Tascan appears to have many microphone inputs,
which cannot serve <br>
> for line level input, if that really is so, it's
out. <br>
> <br>
> The Behringer requires the app, which I have not
been able to test, <br>
> but its accessibility is not that important, if the
XR18 will remember <br>
> settings across power cycles. <br>
> <br>
> The ARC16C's description reads very well, but there
are many dubious <br>
> reviews, perhaps it was an early "Monday"
manufacturing problem though. <br>
> <br>
> My requirements: one mic in (no need for +48V
phantom power), one <br>
> instrument in (Clavinet, I think it needs extra
amping), at least 12 <br>
> line level ins, 14 preferred. Four outputs (main
out and to "sends" to <br>
> outboard). No DSP, routing/bussing,... My workflow
is purely centred <br>
> in the box, using JACK for all connections. <br>
> <br>
> Based on the three candidates, I'd say my price
range has to go up to <br>
> 700 EUR. <br>
> <br>
> Any experiences and further suggestions are very
much appreciated! <br>
> <br>
> Best wishes, <br>
> <br>
> Jeanette <br>
> <br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>