Hello :)
I've got some trouble with Dynebolic and Linux in general.
Relevant for my question(s) is this hardware and Software:
Mobo ASRock K7VT2, Chipset VIA KT266A, AMD Athlon 900MHz
Swissonic MIDI-USB 1x1, Plug & Play
Soundcard TerraTec EWX 24/96 without MIDI
Dynebolic ver 2.2 DHORUBA 6Oct06
Dynebolic ver 1.4.1 LUMUMBA 15Jan05
Question(s) about Version 2.2
If I try to run Ardour (by the Terminal) while Jack is running the
following messages are displayed:
[d:b] ~ #ardour
[...]
ardour: [INFO]: Jack server started
[...]
ardour: [INFO]: No H/W specific optimizations in use
ardour: [WARNING]: Your system generates "Mod2" when the NumLock key is
pressed.
This can cause problems when editing so Ardour will use Mod3 to mean
Meta rather than Mod2
zsh: 6462 illegal hardware instruction ardour
[d:b] ~ #
Ardour won't be opened.
In Version 1.4.1 Jack doesn't recognize the MIDI of the game port and
USB but if I run Ardour there the following will be displayed:
[d:b] ~ #ardour
[...]
ardour: [ERROR] MIDI: no such port device
ardour: [ERROR] MIDI: no such port device
ardour: [WARNING]: Your system generates "Mod2" when the NumLock key is
pressed.
This can cause problems when editing so Ardour will use Mod3 to mean
Meta rather than Mod2
[]
Ardour will be opened.
How can I get Ardour running in Version 2.2?
More questions are already loaded ;).
Greetings
Ralf Mardorf
Germany
Oberhausen Rheinland
> None of that is a concern here. The "intellectual property risk" is only
> a problem in the USA because they support software patents. We don't
> have that in Europe, so the "intellectual propery risk" does not exist
> in Europe. There is still "copyright protection" in Europe, but Linux
> has the GPL license, so that is also not a business "risk".
>
> James
This was not posted because of copyright/IP reasons, but rather the business
model that the article implies Novell may be pushing for.
Ico
> Regarding the webmastering, I just might be interested, but I'm not sure
> that I can put in the effort required. I am of the opinion that the
> Linux audio community should gain from having a consistent layout on the
> sites, perhaps even a set of prominent links like for instance the
> OSDL-sites. This would require some serious work. How many people are
> involved today?
Linuxaudio.org has a small active staff and until very recently it was
predominantly a one-man show. I am hoping to change this as for one I am
really getting burned out and two, I want to utilize my energy on other
pressing and likely more important matters, such as incorporation of the
organization as a non-profit entity and fund-raising. Unfortunately, even
though we had a successful first round of recruiting volunteers, we are
hardly at a point where I can say linuxaudio.org has adequate staffing.
Regarding consistency, I am very much interested in that but putting some
more thought into it (which was in part inspired by the discussion on the
consortium list), I feel like total standardization may not be a good idea
not only because some of the consolidated websites' webmasters do not feel
inclined to do so, but also because we want the consortium to also reflect
the freedom and variety Linux audio offers. Hence, standardization as such
will likely come in something more subtle (i.e. logo plus perhaps some kind
of a subtle corner css menu thingy). That being said, we've not tackled this
yet, hence your contributions/ideas are more than welcome.
Best wishes,
Ico
Adoption of linux-sound.org into linuxaudio.org is a continuing standing
offer, but obviously this is something that the community needs to embrace,
rather than having a hostile takeover which will leave a sour aftertaste in
everyone's mouths.
Provided that the community is fine with this, the proposed course of action
would be as follows:
1)generate apps.linuxaudio.org subdomain and port over a summary list of the
applications (similar to Dave's format)
2) plug every listed app to the docs.linuxaudio.org wiki where we would
build largest and most comprehensive documentation database
Alternately, we could simply do everything inside docs.linuxaudio.org, but I
feel that the usefulness of Dave's pages would be somewhat lost unless the
docs would also have a nice categorized listing of available apps.
Best wishes,
Ico
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-dev-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-dev-
> bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Phillips
> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 1:20 PM
> To: LAD Mail List; LAU Mail List
> Subject: [linux-audio-dev] rebuilding the linux soundapps site
>
> Greetings:
>
> I've received a few notes that indicate people are interested in
> revising the look & feel of the site at linux-sound.org.
>
> If you're currently working on such a project *please* make your
> intentions public. There are at least two projects working towards the
> same end, and this is truly one wheel that does not need reinvention.
> Better that folks work together on it.
>
> Best,
>
> dp
Hi Nedko,
A while ago I proposed merging documentation efforts of the community,
spearheaded by Dave's now unfortunately cancelled 2nd edition of his
venerable book. Linuxaudio.org is already trying to head in this direction
and we are currently in the process of assembling a team to utilize
presently empty sub-domain docs.linuxaudio.org which ought to be perfect for
this purpose (rather than hijacking lau faq site which has its own specific
purpose). One possible scenario (which FWIW I very much favor) is to have a
Wiki page that would sum up all of the projects listed on Dave's site as
well as those that are also relevant but have not yet made it there. Using a
similar template format we should provide a continuously updated
consolidated resource for all Linux audio users, and more importantly all
Linux distributions to reference. As such, we are also hoping to attract
various distros to contribute to the same documentation project. So far
goto10 guys (dyne creators) have expressed interest in the idea...
Best wishes,
Ico
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nedko Arnaudov [mailto:nedko@arnaudov.name]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:09 PM
> To: ico(a)linuxaudio.org
> Subject: linux audio wiki
>
> There was a talk in #lad and there is idea to have general purpose wiki
> for linux audio. http://lau.linuxaudio.org/faq looks perfect except that
> it is "user" faq oriented. What you think about having "lau faq"
> category with all current lau faq pages in it and using the mediawiki
> installation as general purpose linux audio wiki. Such wiki will include
> user and developer oriented pages. It will include also information
> about belonging of software to groups like lv2, dssi, jack, alsa midi,
> jack midi, jack audio, sequencer, host, etc. Something similar (software
> categorization/grouping) is made at http://linux-sound.org/ and
> http://lawiki.fugal.net/linuxaudio/show/HomePage
>
> --
> Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Apologies for the cross-posting -- the consortium listserv that is hosted by
Agnula server continues to refuse forwarding e-mail to its members...
Apropos CD covers for the vol.1, how about taking the image from the
http://lau.linuxaudio.org/faq/ ? IMHO it best portrays the idea of "Tux
Power" without even having to explicitly state the subtitle. So, we could
have the subtitle on the side and the back but perhaps not on the front side
of the cover? Or if we do have it on the front, perhaps making it
intentional small and inconspicuous?
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Composition, Music Technology, CCTAD, and CHCI
Virginia Tech
Dept. of Music - 0240
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-1137
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
ico(a)vt.edu
http://www.music.vt.edu/people/faculty/bukvic/
To the staff members:
Hope you are getting comfortable with your new roles. I would like to use
this opportunity to solicit updates from you guys. I am also to let you know
that unfortunately Ross Hamblin who was our docs.linuxaudio.org webmaster
will be stepping down due to some unforeseen health problems. This means
that we need to make another call for volunteer staff. In addition, one of
our yet to be announced new members goto10.org are also working on a
documentation project and it seems that it would be a good idea to join
forces for this purpose. Please use this e-mail therefore as a catalyst for
further discussion.
Cc: linuxaudio.org consortium mailing list
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Linuxaudio.org Director
Virginia Tech
Department of Music - 0240
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-1137
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
ico(a)linuxaudio.org
http://www.music.vt.edu/people/faculty/bukvic
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>(incf thanks)
>
>Thanks Dave, your musings will be sorely missed...
>
Well, I'm still maintaining my Linux audio blog for the Linux Journal. I
write two entries per month there, another part of "what keeps Dave busy".
Best,
dp