-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
linuxaudio.org will be down this Sunday, November 18, from 11:00 to
12:00 EST because our hosting provider is maintaining the storage system.
sorry for the inconvenience,
robin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=Bydq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi all,
Ico - director of linuxaudio.org - arranged to quadruple the disk-space
for our servers.
Amongst other things, this will allow us to host large
sample-collections (an endeavor Nils has started) as well as prepare for
videos from the upcoming Linux-Audio-Conference.
linuxaudio.org services will be offline for 5-10 mins later today
(around 45 min from now).
26/Sept - 16:00 UTC
thanks for your understanding.
robin
Hi,
I propose that we create a new subdomain called : distro.linuxaudio.org
At this location we create a webpage that lists all the audio
distributions for linux audio and serves as a canonical reference for
projects that have been abandoned. We also host the latest/last version of
every distribution on the list.
Kind of like a history of Linux Audio Distributions.
One appeal in hosting this at linuxaudio.org is that there are a few
distros already hosted there. Another is that it might keep the flame
burning for people who are thinking of rolling their own in the future.
Distro's take a considerable amount of time and effort to produce so
honouring them with a "Hall of Fame" so to speak is fulfilling the remit
of the consortium to promote Linux Audio to a wider audience.
Of course if there is no interest project I will set it up on
linux-audio.com so either way we don't loose out. In an ideal situation we
host the data in a couple of locations for redundancy. Given that
linuxaudio.org servers are in the USA and linux-audio.com servers are in
the EU it seems like a good combination to me. Taking it a step further
maybe we can get some of the EU based Universities or institutes to
contribute some hardware and then I don't have to pay for the EU host out
of my own pocket.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
Apologies for x-posting...
It's been a busy summer--pd-l2ork
<http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56>has been making big strides
towards becoming a robust full-fledged digital signal processing tool.
The latest version includes revolutionary preset_hub and preset_node
system that supports a wide range of data types as well as abstractions.
It is essentially Pd's counterpart toMax's pattrstorage
<http://cycling74.com/docs/max5/refpages/max-ref/pattrstorage.html>.
We've also squashed dozens of bugs and clean-ups making pd-l2ork better
than ever.
Perhaps the most exciting improvement involves Pd-L2Ork'sK12 module
<http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?p=1964>geared towards elementary,
middle, and high school students. The new version has over 40
objects/abstractions, allowing students to seamlessly interact with both
Wiimotes andSARC iteration of Arduino Uno devices (a.k.a. Sarcduino
firmware) <http://www.musicsensorsemotion.com/2010/03/08/sarcduino/>.
And this very version together with 15 L2Ork stations is being used this
week by more than 30 middle-school students as part of the inauguralICAT
K12 Maker Workshop <http://www.icat.vt.edu/> taking place in Virginia
Tech Institute for Creativity, Arts & Technology's Studio 1. So, head on
over to the L2Ork's software page
<http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56>and check out what the
latest version of pd-l2ork is all about ;-)
Best wishes,
--
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A
Composition, Music Technology
Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio
Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
Head, ICAT IMPACT Studio
Virginia Tech
Department of Music
Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240
(540) 231-6139
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
disis.music.vt.edul2ork.music.vt.eduico.bukvic.net
Hi all,
http://wiki.linuxaudio.org is seeing an increasing amount of SPAM.
For a while it has been sufficient to [fail2]ban IP addresses that
incorrectly guess CAPTCHA - ie. prevent brute-force attacks and manually
revert the remaining pollution. -- Yet in the last months either CAPTCHA
breaking has improved or there are real persons doing the spamming.
I did not do statistics, but from watching the changelog I gather that
the vast majority of contributions to the wiki comes from registered
users. So the idea is to lock the wiki down and only allow registered
users (registration requires an email address) to edit it.
Thoughts? Objections?
robin
Hi Tim,
On 04/27/2012 12:43 AM, Tim Orford wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 05:47:03PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> == The questionable - vhosts that may need work ==
>> [...]
>>
>> http://ladspavst.linuxaudio.org/
>> pretty much dysfunct site of Linux VST Compatibility
>> not sure what to do with it. - previously maintained by Tim Orford
>
> My apologies for non-maintenance. It was destroyed by spammers.
> It needs access to mysql backups
When did the spamming start? We [only] have monthly SQL backups since
August 2010.
http://ladspavst.linuxaudio.org/vst/list?page=8 seems to be the
beginning of the mess. -- Feb 13 - but which year? There's also some
SPAM from before that :(
and upgrade to Drupal 7.
You do have full access to
linuxaudio:/home/sites/ladspavst.linuxaudio.org/
and the mysql database it currently uses.
> However, given that there is from my POV less need for it
> than previously, I vote to remove it (semi?) permanently.
One idea would be to revert the DB to a last-known good state and then
freeze the site until s.o. comes up with a small script that imports the
content into the wiki.
Not sure how useful that'd be, though. Wine and linux-VST-support have
evolved quite a bit since you've started that project.
2c,
robin
On 04/26/2012 10:51 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
> Yes, and on top of that unscrupulous persons will use your AWStats
> pages to create links to their malware pages by faking referrer
> headers, believe it or not.
oh yeah, i'm getting a few of those. it's not awstats specific, though,
i guess they do that for all publicly available stats pages. stats
should definitely be noindex...
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
On 04/22/2012 02:27 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
> On Sun, April 22, 2012 1:52 pm, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> On 04/22/2012 12:12 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, April 22, 2012 11:24 am, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>>> On 04/22/2012 11:15 AM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm still not sure why you don't want businesses to give people round
>>>>> here
>>>>> money.
>>>>
>>>> Not at all. "people 'round here" can take all the money they want from
>>>> anyone for whatever they deem fit.
>>>>
>>>> but linuxaudio.org itself will have a hard time. Usually money comes
>>>> with obligations and we are in no position to handle that properly.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe I am naive but I thought our obligation as a consortium was to
>>> discuss these topics and come to a workable solution that benefits all
>>> members.
>>
>> just take it in stride. -- Your obligation as member of the management
>> board is also to meet with the others at least once a year :) [ see 2.
>> at http://linuxaudio.org/policy ]
>>
>
> Funny that no one brought it up until now...
I did. 4-5 times over the last 7 years.
Most of the LAO crowd meets at the Linux Audio Conference but the
majority of the Management Board has been absent there in recent years.
[..]
>> My personal opinion aside:
>>
>> I'm in favor to maintain a reasonable approach.
>> The freedom of the community (no user-tracking, no obligations WRT to
>> content posted on the site, no harassment, no discrimination, etc) takes
>> priority. We should _not_ be "completely anti advertising", but think
>> twice before adding ads or agreeing to 3rd party conditions.
>>
>> We can certainly express gratitude or favor companies that support
>> linuxaudio.org but must be careful about maintaining independence.
>>
>> It's not possible to generalize advertising campaigns, but online
>> marketing techniques usually come with strings attached..
>>
>> Nobody complained that you put a link to _your_ site on the pages _you_
>> maintain on *.linuxaudio.org - but 3rd party interests - esp paid - are
>> questionable.
>>
>
> Hence the request for clarification of Policy. Instead all I get is a knee
> jerk reaction and irrational prejudice. Hardly conducive to making
> progress...
I tried hard to explain the position and make it clear that it's not a
/knee jerk/ reaction.
let me try this way: the few bucks that linuxaudio.org could make via
adverstising on linuxaudio.org will - in commercial context - never be
able to pay for the services linuxaudio.org provides - and not even pay
for the administrative overhead.
If you have a viable business plan, we're all ear.
> So a policy that sets clear guidelines is completely out of the question?
Dunno, that's a question for the management board, not me.
linuxaudio.org has no treasurer, no guidelines or infrastructure to deal
with donations or money. There are no established procedures how the
Board needs to agree and how to deal with such funds.
Besides that, a policy would need to be in accordance to the rules of
the Commonwealth of Virginia and Virginia Tech (our host). Ico has
elaborated on that in his email to you from 04/20/2012 02:57 AM CEST on
the consortium list.
>From what I've learned: official policies are best avoided and replaced
with common-sense.
> Is it simply in the "Too Hard" basket?
It's in the "we're happily ignorant about it" basket :)
robin