24 Jan
2004
24 Jan
'04
2:28 p.m.
On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 11:46, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
Just to remind you.
http://eca.cx/lad/2004/01/0132.html
which was post #41 *after* i have crossposted on LAD.
So you should know that the one who has registered the domain
has got (to quote)"definitive power over that domain".
That isn't the consortium since it isn't a legal entity and can't claim
ownership.
Who registered the domain?
Marek Peteraj <marpet(a)naex.sk> writes:
Of course. Linuxaudio.org has been registered for being used by the
Consortium. As such, I don't have any definitive power over that
domain, I need to ask for a voting to take place.
See below.
If we
reach a consensus on how to handle this thing, I could even
propose (as a consortium member)
You could even propose to the members?? No thanks.
As you wish.
> > You don't have to. Luckily I can
*now* read it here:
> > http://lists.agnula.org/pipermail/consortium/2004-January/thread.html
>
> You could read everything even before, you just had to subscribe.
There was no link. Remember?
If you tried to visit the archives via:
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/consortium-p
you should have seen all the instructions to subscribe. Listen. I'm not going to repeat myself over
and over again. Almost
everything has been said in the LAD linuxaudio.org thread. Basic law
background would help you to understand. I don't have the energy to
explain things when all i get is your offending tone.
I happen to have a slightly-more-than-basic law background (italian
civil law) thanks to my studies. I read the "linuxadio.org" thread on
LAD. Still, I don't get your points. Since you are trying to
convince me (as a member of the consortium) that my ideas are wrong, I
suspect the burden of being repetitive and/or more convincing is on
your shoulders.
Again: grow a thicker skin.
Learn how to be more polite.
Marek