29 Jan
2004
29 Jan
'04
2:23 a.m.
Andrea Glorioso wrote:
not yet. i agree with what you say below:
Joern Nettingsmeier
<nettings(a)folkwang-hochschule.de> writes:
excellent idea. if not presenting, then at least creating a draft.
perhaps a nice "linux audio social
contract", no longer than one page ?
(daniel, iirc it was you who complained about the gpl being too long
and nobody reading it - i agree totally!)
I think that would be a good thing to have. Be prepared for some
*long* discussion, however.
It could make sense to draft a proposal and reserve a slot during the
2nd LAD conference for presenting it (as well as on the relevant
mailing lists, of course), what do you think? but this
probably justifies a new thread.
Are you going to open it? :) I'd like to have a clearer understanding of what
the legal situation
of the Consortium is (or is planned to be). I do understand that
Daniel James is *very* busy preparing the booth at the Sounds Expo
2004, so we might as well stop making noise and wait for some answers
before going on (I'm not trying to pressure Daniel or anybody else, I
just believe in making small steps and fixing bugs/problems when they
arise - the legal status of the Consortium in all of this discussion
is, if not a bug, at least a point of uncertainty I'd like to see
resolved as soon as possible).
neither am i. time to shut up and let it simmer a little :)
daniel, once you are back, will you be with us in karlsruhe? if you
like andrea's idea of a presentation, how about getting in touch
with mana and frank?
--
"I never use EQ, never, never, never. I previously used to use mic
positioning but I've even given up on that too."
- Jezar on http://www.audiomelody.com
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany
http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)