-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
hi Ivica,
thanks for your clarifications!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:22:10AM -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
think such
projects, especially when still in their
Consortium's mission is to foster a development of *any* legal
incentive which has, does, or has a potential to foster proliferation
of Linux as a viable DAW.
AFAIK, so far its role has been almost related to promotion and the
work done by a few people here who have my gratitude.
now i look forward to efforts in fostering development!
any ideas in mind? money is not the best way IMHO.
linking with hardware manufacturers has been mentioned (and done?)
what else?
starting
phase, can be considered to have contributed so much to
development and dissemination of our common efforts.
All projects were at some point in their starting phase. That fact alone
should therefore not be taken as a measure of their current or future
success, or their eligibility for the
Linuxaudio.org membership...
so if post the 0.1 of my new little sw used by me and my cousin in a
performance, i can already be part of the consortium?
do we distinguish between membership of communities, foundations,
individuals, companies etc. ?
and one last question to help me understand better:
who takes decisions and how?
ciao
- --
jaromil,
dyne.org rasta coder,
http://afrolinux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Cryptographically signed mail, see
http://gnupg.org
iD8DBQFEIrWwe2QxhLU0C14RAhSBAJwJXNvkEabQxuXnniA4vnzZr/iDhQCfcq0K
C7IFEn0kKsHjmrlgYmLWNBA=
=OK+s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----