It represents the linux audio developers, the linux
audio users,>> > linux audio applications/projects.
> I hoped it to be a home for LAD, LAU and
LAA, and to offer more -
community news, documentiation and tutorials, etc.
> As I already told you, I'm more than willing to propose, as soon as>>
the voting rules are established, that specific subdomains of>>
linuxaudio.org be devoted to such services.>>>> I personally won't have
the time to work on the actual services. I'm>> confident that willing people
will do that. Are you volunteering?
once
linuxaudio.org has had time to work out
their aims and policies
in more detail, i would like to propose that
linuxaudio.org, the lad page
and possibly others (such as dave's and patrick's site) work out a> corporate
design of sorts (or maybe just a logo) and form a web ring.
Joern, the problem is - a webring won't solve the fragmentation of linux audio on the
web.
See
www.jabber.org and
www.jabberstudio.org to get an idea of what i was talking about.
Using a domain name with a crucial keyword for a consortium while leaving crucial
information placed all over the net isn't going to help us.
Grep in your archives for my email from july, august or september.
for the time being, i think it's best not to
bring the subject to> LAD again, but in the long run, once
linuxaudio.org has more
clearly> defined itself, i'd like to discuss the web ring idea on the list>
and see what can be done.
I'm not sure what are the missing points on the
TODO list for
"defining" the consortium. Daniel?
Lots more than you might think, Andrea. There are lots of legal issues involved. I
don't want to go into more details at the moment.
But a non-profit organisation consisting of natural members - members of a community is a
model that has been adopted in many oss communities.
See fsf, gnome, xiph, X.org.
to quote
http://www.newsforge.com/software/04/01/23/0020201.shtml?tid=130&tid=13…
"X.org no longer "the X consortium" -- is now a 501(c)(3) non-profit
organization."
Marek