On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
From the first
half of the article one could think that a misunderstanding took
place. The author
uses the term "free software updates", but he obviously was
not referring to updates of "free software" but to free "software
updates".
But then he writes this: "In fact, there are still those totally illogical
people who think that all software should be free, no matter how much effort has
been put into creating it - but that's an argument for another day! I'm sure
those people wouldn't want to leave their front doors open with a 'Help Yourself
To All My Stuff' sign outside, yet that seems to be exactly what they expect
from software companies."
Thats true, its the classic Free v's $0 confusion.
- Steve