Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 4:14 PM, rosea.grammostola
<rosea.grammostola(a)protonmail.com> wrote:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 2:52 PM, Fons Adriaensen fons(a)linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 07:41:56PM +0000,
rosea.grammostola wrote:
Of course, a generic solution/rule would be good
so we don't have
this issue with other projects in the future again.
IMHO, no more 'rules' are required, and this matter should be
put to rest.
@Fons, you can't say that the
linuxaudio.org is a joke when people just use the name
linuxaudio.org for a fork like this and release it as it was released by
linuxaudio.org,
and say at the same time that this matter should be put to rest, without taking any
action.
Then the simple conclusion would be that
linuxaudio.org consortium is a joke an stays a
joke. And why should people put this matter to rest then? Then we still have this unfair
situation.
@Spencer and @Robin, what's your take on a solution for this matter?
Regards,
\r