On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:45 PM, David Nielson <david@naptastic.com> wrote:


On 02/01/2016 08:31 AM, Kjetil Matheussen wrote:
>
> I was thinking of a new configuration protocol where any libjack client
> can function as server.
>

:|

why would you do that?

Well, one reason is to force forward a formally defined configuration protocol which is actually used.
qjackctl would be forced to use this configuration, and the same with jackd. No more flaky
use of sending around very informally specified strings via stdout and stdin as a communication protocol.