Stop forking around

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:57 PM, drew Roberts <zotz@100jamz.com> wrote:
On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
> i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
> were forked

This is not about what is going in in this thread in any direct way. (Or may
not be at least, I do not know enough to say I guess.)

What if I "fork" a project because I think it gives me a good starting point
or base for what I want to do but the direction I intend to take things will
result in a completely different sort of program to the one I forked? Should
that still be considered a fork or is there another term for such a beast?
Would another term be useful?

all the best,

drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev



--
"Cheshire-Puss," she began, "would you tell me, please,
which way I ought to go from here?"
"That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat.
"I don't care much where--" said Alice.
"Then it doesn't matter which way you go," said the Cat.