Am 20.09.2013 11:00, schrieb michel dominique:
On jeu. 19/09/13 17:50 , IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2013-09-19 05:31, hermann meyer wrote:
> >> 
> > I'm sad to hear that. :-( Please don't let you lead from the things
> > you didn't like, let you lead from the things you like instead. I
> > guess then it's necessary to let you know that we use /as well/ a
> > fork of your work, the zita-convolver library, in the guitarix
> > project. But we leave your copyright untouched, and the fork will
> > only come in use, when the user set a explicit compile flag. We
> > didn't promote it, or force the fork. Ordinary your original code
> > is in use. We do it to use ffmpeg instead fftw3 FFT, which perform
> > better on ARM devices.
> 
> but this sounds like the perfect opportunity to not do a simple fork,
> but to send patches to upstream so fons' aeolus could support both
> fftw3 and ffmpeg FFTs.
> it might be a win-win situation, where not only more than just the
> original aeolus users can profit from fons' work (because you use his
> code) but also more than just your users can profit from your work
> (because you changes are included into upstream aeolus).
I fully agree. As the main fvwm-crystal developer, I know how hard it can
be to get good users returns. I find it scary if even developers cannot
share with each others.
Oh, we have announced this on the list(s) here some time ago:
Am 18.07.2013 23:29, schrieb Andreas Degert:
The Guitarix developers proudly present

Guitarix release 0.28.0 "magic chainsaw trick" *)

[ . . .]
List of changes:

 [ . . ]
 * Optimizations for embedded systems / ARM processors with NEON
   * --faust-vectorize-float, --convolver-ffmpeg
[ . . . ]
without a single (list) reply, which imply us a low interest in this here.