On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:12 AM,
<fons@kokkinizita.net> wrote:
When they are promoting these sort of idioms, computer
scientists often look like the proverbial 'man with a
hammer'.
These things come and go, every year has its new crop.
After the hype has settled down, they are usually
forgotten.
it seems to me quite the opposite. most of these ideas are actually fairly old. they just never got implemented in or were never supported by a widely used language. i've seen very few "new" ideas show up in programming languages, but what i am happy to see is the relatively careful integration of some of the most useful and powerful idioms from other languages (lisp, python and so forth) into a language where i can actually control precisely what happens (C++). it turns out that there are two levels of care: first, those responsible for the std:: namespace (and even boost:: to some extent), and then myself as an individual programmer making choices about what to use.
--p