Dear Fons,
Please accept an apology from me regarding my slant on your integrity.
When you explained the difference between your wording, of designing
a filter for AMS, not designing the filter of AMS, I realised my mistake in
what was quite a defamatory and insulting email to you. Even considering
the possible ambiguity of your statement, my response was disrespectful,
in error, and I apologise for both.
I will post this to also to the list, even though it was not where I proposed
we held the discussion. At least that way at least that way my accusation
and acknowledgement of fault both appear here which seems reasonable.
Kindest Regards, nick.
> From:
compose59@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:00:28 +0300
> To:
fons@kokkinizita.net> CC:
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> Subject: Re: [LAD] For your information
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:23 AM, <
fons@kokkinizita.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 01:02:27AM +0100, torbenh wrote:
>
> > Reading this old stuff again, it seems the plugins use
> > Fs/16 as the effective control rate - I had completely
> > forgotten about that :-)
> >
> > Ciao,
> >
> > --
> > FA
> >
> > O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
> > E guerra e morte !
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> >
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org> >
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
> >
>
> Aah, the immortality of good ideas.
>
> :)
>
> --
>
www.openoctave.org>
>
midi-subscribe@openoctave.org
>
development-subscribe@openoctave.org> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
>
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
Get it now.