On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Ray Rashif
<schivmeister@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/12/29 torbenh <torbenh@gmx.de>:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:05:01PM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> Aside from that, we have to forget about everything that has anything
>> to do with GTK+. None of what you look forward to is even remotely
>> possible with the examples and advice given so far (I mean just one
>> look at libphat is..urghhh just another gtk design).
>>
>> Flashy and elegant is Qt's forte, because LMMS has done it. Your
>> resulting app can be simple, good-looking, skinnable. There's EFL, but
>> no-one knows whether it's even usable for multimedia.
>
> what is this ? gui flamewars ?
> idiots.
No Torben, that included a comparison because I noted what the poster
was looking for. Nothing more, nothing less. The poster is educated,
so we should have no problems with "flamewars". Sorry if it sounded as
such, will use better phrasing next time.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD