On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Gerald Mwangi wrote: > Oh sorry, I checked it out but the workflow/interface made me think it's > not for a performance act. > And I always felt that tX's workflow and Gui, its support for multiple > turntables suits my needs. > Neverless looking at the mixxx website, mixx has evolved since the last > time i checked it out. > I'll play with it, until I've made tX what I want it to be. > By the way the scratch algorithm in tX is superior to any other program > (even mixxx) I've played with. Well, FWIW, Mixxx is under very active development. They're responsive to code contributions, too. I think I've heard talk that there's guys work on support for more decks, also. (Maybe even more turntables?) Anyway, that also would be a good team to join forces with. :-) -gabriel