Great, I'll likely be a user then! Was planning on using boost whenever possible anyway.

iain

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org> wrote:
> Thanks Tim, I'll def check it out. What's the difference to a newbie like
> myself between yours and the one in Jack?
>
> Congrats btw, that's awesome that your work will be in boost!

the main difference is prbly that the jack ringbuffer is plain c and prbly
needs libjack, while boost.lockfree is a c++ library and header-only.

cheers, tim

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org> wrote:
> > > part I need library help with is likely synchronization and
> > > interprocess/interthread communication. ( ie do I use the jack
> >
> > ringbuffer?
> >
> > > Do I look at boost queue implementations? does RAUL have a higher
> > > level
> > > convenience ring buffer?
> >
> > my boost.lockfree library has been accepted and will be shipped with
> > future boost releases. it contains an mpmc-stack, an mpmc-queue and a
> > wait-free spsc
> > ringbuffer (same algorithm as the jack/kernel/supercollider ringbuffer).
> >
> > git repo: http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=summary
> > (note that the addressing_reviews branch will be the one that will go
> > into boost)