specifically:

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0607186

"Correcting a former proof of M.W. Evans it is shown that his O(3) hypothesis is not Lorentz invariant and hence no law of Physics. "

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AcPPB..39...51B

"We comment on the recent article of M.W. Evans, "Spin Connection Resonance in Gravitational General Relativity", Acta Phys. Pol. B {38}, 2211 (2007). We point out that the equations underlying Evans' theory are highly problematic. Moreover, we demonstrate that the so-called ``spin connection resonance'', predicted by Evans, cannot be derived from the equation he used. We provide an exact solution of Evans' corresponding equation and show that it has definitely no resonance solutions."

http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0411085

"The names tetrad, tetrads, cotetrads, have been used with many different meanings in the physical literature, not all of them, equivalent from the mathematical point of view. In this paper we introduce unambiguous definitions for each one of those terms, and show how the old miscellanea made many authors to introduce in their formalism an ambiguous statement called `tetrad postulate', which has been source of many misunderstandings, as we show explicitly examining examples found in the literature. Since formulating Einstein's field equations intrinsically in terms of cotetrad fields theta^{a}, a = 0,1,2,3 is an worth enterprise, we derive the equation of motion of each theta^{a} using modern mathematical tools (the Clifford bundle formalism and the theory of the square of the Dirac operator). Indeed, we identify (giving all details and theorems) from the square of the Dirac operator some noticeable mathematical objects, namely, the Ricci, Einstein, covariant D'Alembertian and the Hodge Laplacian operators, which permit to show that each theta^{a} satisfies a well defined wave equation. Also, we present for completeness a detailed derivation of the cotetrad wave equations from a variational principal. We compare the cotetrad wave equation satisfied by each theta^{a} with some others appearing in the literature, and which are unfortunately in error. "

Compare and contrast for interesting sociological effect, if you will, to the treatment received by Galileo.