On 08/09/2009 06:05 AM, Raymond Martin wrote:
On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:44:41 drew Roberts wrote:
  
On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
    
Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork?  Is there a guide
that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
result of your efforts?
      
Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this
point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is
the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with new
text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking either of
the projects.)
    

There is no decompiled source anywhere on the project. It is all code
straight from the original Impro-Visor on SF.

  


Ok, Just to get this straight in my head.

After you decompiled the code and threatened to put the results of your labour online as a fork which encouraged Bob Keller to finally publish the code in a public repo you have now taken that code and changed it just a little bit, given it exactly the same name and are hosting it at the same location as the official public release?






Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd



Raymond
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev