On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:28 PM, benravin <ben.alex@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi Paul,

I feel its better to add these support as well in JACK framework, like
sending control signals, notifications etc, rather than user has to
implement these.

Hi Ben,

Please be aware of "top posting" - it is good manners to reply under a message, so the context of the reply is maintained.

In response to your comments above, I will politely disagree. While a library or framework to do async messaging etc might be useful to some JACK users, it will certainly not benefit everybody. As such, it should be a separate project, and not demand that existing JACK users also have to deal with this extra complexity/functionality.

Some googling will likely lead you to multiple frameworks or libraries that provide lock-free programming constructs like queues, FIFOs, locks etc. There's even a few old threads on this mailing-list[1] about it :)

Regards, -Harry
 
[1] http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2011/11/0150.html
 



--