Thank you, I will try to bite the source code ;-)

I want to say that I was trying NSM yesterday and I'm very impressed by it's simplicity and (a no minor point) it's desing from the graphical point of view.
I want to say that I'm very impressed by the thoroughness of the documentation, something that I always admire.

From the **USER** point of view I had tried Jack Session and LASH (a long time ago when it was a requirement with FST) and by now NSM (a bit hasty decision) is in the 1st place.


Maybe now it's the time that people involved in LAD (I'm just a user with a little code experience, but I can help in any way) just try to document the advantages and disadvantages about Jack-session, LASH, LADISH, Scripts, NSM in http://jackaudio.org/persistent_connections, or maybe in the Jack Wiki just like the Jack1 and Jack2 comparison document that was included some time ago.

I think that it could help devs and users as well to get a picture of the current Session Managment world in JACK.


Thanks for this great peace of software.

Diego


2012/3/26 Emanuel Rumpf <xbran@web.de>
Am 26. März 2012 22:17 schrieb Diego Simak <diego.simak@gmail.com>:
>
> is there any document where to read more about NSM other than
> http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/ ?
>
There is
http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html

In the source package, there is some documentation too !
Finally there is always the source code :)

> Thanks for your help.
> Diego
>
Thanks for interest.

--
E.R.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev