31 Dec
2010
31 Dec
'10
9:09 a.m.
It was so terribly cold. Snow was falling, and it was almost dark.
Evening came on, the last evening of the year. In the cold and gloom a
poor little girl, bareheaded and barefoot, was walking through the
streets. Of course when she had left her house she'd had slippers on,
but what good had they been? ...
The Little Match Girl
http://mx44.linux.dk/~jens/unpublished/mtchgirl.mp3
...
"She wanted to warm herself," the people said. No one imagined what
beautiful things she had seen, and how happily she had gone with her old
grandmother into the bright New Year.
31 Dec
31 Dec
10:02 a.m.
On Friday, December 31, 2010 04:02:03 am Jens M Andreasen did opine:
It was so terribly cold. Snow was falling, and it was
almost dark.
Evening came on, the last evening of the year. In the cold and gloom a
poor little girl, bareheaded and barefoot, was walking through the
streets. Of course when she had left her house she'd had slippers on,
but what good had they been? ...
The Little Match Girl
http://mx44.linux.dk/~jens/unpublished/mtchgirl.mp3
Thats beautiful Jens, thank you.
...
"She wanted to warm herself," the people said. No one imagined what
beautiful things she had seen, and how happily she had gone with her old
grandmother into the bright New Year.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
No sooner said than done -- so acts your man of worth.
-- Quintus Ennius
12:50 p.m.
Hello Jens!
Iloved the piece. It had that bit of "Skandinavian depression" in it, that I
can related to quite well.
But one questin arose while listening: Did you use any effects on this? I
sometimes had the feeling, that there was something warbling slightly, like
you had use a phaser or tremolo or something in a very subtel way. Was this
only one piano, or did you perhaps use two sounds layered? I'm intrigued,
because as an effect it was quite need: Noticeable but not beat me in the
face. :-)
Warmly yours
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
2:22 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
But one questin arose while listening: Did you use
any effects on this? I
sometimes had the feeling, that there was something warbling slightly, like
you had use a phaser or tremolo or something in a very subtel way.
The lame encoder adds a noticeable warbling at 128Kbit, there is less on
the original, but still:
The attack part of the sound is composed of two short samples of a
Yamaha grand of slightly different velocities, but here just spread out
for a wide and clear soundfield. Velocity nuances are instead handled by
filtering. The short piano samples by themselves have a very audible
loop, as in: "Ding, Zing, zing, z...", so after half a second (or so), I
blend in a mild pwm with a saw, filtered to match the overall sound. as
well as to give a slight vocal, singing character. Real pianos do not
have this kind of extended sustain.
The pwm/saw is finally routed through a three way chorus which makes
them sound a bit as if it were the neighbouring strings that were
resonating and reverberating. Or, that is at least what was intended.
The modulation wheel is wired to vibrato (on pwm/saw ) as well as send
to delay line for a longer, even more "singing" sustain. This is not in
use here though. The second modulation wheel is wired to turn filtering
far down, plate reverberation off as well as release rate to none for a
very dry, round "fusion-like" micromoog sound.
Was this
only one piano, or did you perhaps use two sounds layered? I'm intrigued,
because as an effect it was quite need: Noticeable but not beat me in the
face. :-)
It will "beat you in the face" if you collapse the two channels into
mono - so don't do that!
/J
Warmly yours
Julien
2:33 p.m.
Hello Jens!
wow, this is an elaborate setup. I suppose, what I perceived as light
chorus/phaser is actually the intended bit. Which software did you use to do
it?
Thanks for going into all that detail, it was very interesting to read and
well done for keeping it so unobtrusive and simple. You did go to a great
length to get that particular sound.
Kindly yours
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
3:55 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 14:33 +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
Which software did you use to do
it?
I am sorry to disappoint you, but:
When my DX7 broke down this summer I went looking for a DX5 (with more
keys), but instead ended up with a €400 second hand EX5 .. Thats it!
It's twelve years old, and terribly buggy - like driving an elderly
french car with a mind of its own - but it has what I need on board.
Mastering is done on a pocket sized 24bit Roland R1, that the former
owner parted with for €30 ...
Pre Millenium digital gear is traded for next to nothing these days.
That being said. there isn't any technical hindrance for setting up a
similar sound on linux. The problem mainly being finding a set of clear
and concise pianosamples that are not covered by copyright.
/J
4 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Jens M Andreasen
<jens.andreasen(a)comhem.se> wrote:
When my DX7 broke down this summer I went looking for
a DX5 (with more
keys), but instead ended up with a €400 second hand EX5 .. Thats it!
the ex5 is my bar-none favorite yamaha synth of all time.
unfortunately, it is very underpowered...5 different synth engines,
but you can only run 1 at a time. still an amazing synth. great midi
controller, too.
--
Josh Lawrence
www.hardbop200.com
4:04 p.m.
Hello Jens!
Oh nothing against the EX series. I listened to a workstation comparison
between some of its tme and the EX had sme clever technology in it. Yamaha was
always good about that, only at this time, their samples weren't too good.
Still physical modelling wise and in some other technical respects, I always
thought, that they were clever machines.
Kindly yours
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
4:24 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 16:04 +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
Hello Jens!
Oh nothing against the EX series. I listened to a workstation comparison
between some of its tme and the EX had sme clever technology in it. Yamaha was
always good about that, only at this time, their samples weren't too good.
Still physical modelling wise and in some other technical respects, I always
thought, that they were clever machines.
Kindly yours
Julien
OT:
I marked this thread for reading next year ;).
I bought one of the first Yamaha DX7 (brown metal case), when I was
around 16 years old, today I'm 44 years old. It's my master keyboard
since that time! It had and still has got some software issues, but I
didn't switch to an upgraded version by warranty or by any other upgrade
and today I'm happy that I never did this. A friend has got a DX7 (resp.
it is 2 DX7) in a black plastic case, this machine doesn't sound as good
as an original DX7, it does nearly sound as bad as Hexter.
IMO any synths based on the DX7, e.g. DX1, TX7 etc. TXx (not DX9 etc.)
are unique. Btw. there's a book from 1984 "Yamaha DX7 Digital
Synthesizer" by Asuhiko Fukuda with some math about the DX7 AFAIR he was
the first one who emulated barking dogs etc., in the mid-nineties there
get choirs around that sound similar to sampled choirs.
And DX7 and DX7 II still have got very good keyboards. I know, today
there are some other and better keyboards for synth available, still the
DX7 keyboard is one of the good keyboards.
4:32 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
Hello Ralf1
I do have a DX7 IID and I think it's a nice instrument, for what it's
supposed to do. But I think Hexter is not too far of base. I played them both
and I enjoyed them both very much. I suspect that the IID model might have had
some changes to its inner workings. But I wouldn't think, that there was too
much changed, since it was mainly about the memory cartridge, as far as I
know.
Yes the keyboard isn't too bad, even compared to some of the new ones I
have. It's a little too loud for my taste, but the feeling, while playing it,
is about right. There's one keyboard (as in the keys only), that beats them
all: The Roaldn XP keyboard. I have the XP30 and the keyboard is marvellous.
Not weighted, I'm not sure, who has the best ones there, but quieter than the
DX, not too soft and the aftertouch is really fluent. You don't really notice
the point, where you get from just holding down, to aftertouch. Of course, you
have to use some extra strength, so you don't activate it by accident, but no
click or anything.
So for gettng this of track, when I got it off track before. :-) But talking
synth is always nice, if you ever encountered the gear in question. :-)
Kindly yours
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
4:56 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 16:32 +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
Hello Ralf1
I do have a DX7 IID and I think it's a nice instrument, for what it's
supposed to do. But I think Hexter is not too far of base.
I didn't compare DX7 and DX7 II directly, but I've got the impression
that at least the preset sounds of the DX7 II are less good, but the DX7
sounds and I've got the impression that Hexter does sound similar to the
DX7 II. The problem might be my sound card ;).
My DX7 does sound much better, but Hexter does.
Hm, a friend hopefully still has got his DX7 II, maybe he sold it at
Ebay. A direct comparison might be interesting.
Btw. for my 'one of the first' DX7 there's unwanted noise when I use the
modulation wheel to control the volume. In 198x they said that this is a
failure by the software and they would give me an upgraded DX7, but IMO
even those DX7 did sound different.
OT: I never noticed any difference for the sound quality, of different
versions of the Prophet 5, but I guess everybody heard about stable or
unstable tuning for different versions of the Mini Moog ;). Revisions
could have different qualities. [OT end]
I played them both
and I enjoyed them both very much. I suspect that the IID model might have had
some changes to its inner workings. But I wouldn't think, that there was too
much changed, since it was mainly about the memory cartridge, as far as I
know.
Yes the keyboard isn't too bad, even compared to some of the new ones I
have. It's a little too loud for my taste,
*lol* Full ACK, while Achim's DX7 II has a much less loud keyboard (but
still a loud keyboard), my old DX7 in the brown metal case really has
got a loud keyboard.
Yes, this is the week point of this keyboard.
but the feeling, while playing it,
is about right. There's one keyboard (as in the keys only), that beats them
all: The Roaldn XP keyboard. I have the XP30 and the keyboard is marvellous.
Not weighted, I'm not sure, who has the best ones there, but quieter than the
DX, not too soft and the aftertouch is really fluent. You don't really notice
the point, where you get from just holding down, to aftertouch. Of course, you
have to use some extra strength, so you don't activate it by accident, but no
click or anything.
So for gettng this of track, when I got it off track before. :-) But talking
synth is always nice, if you ever encountered the gear in question. :-)
Kindly yours
Julien
As a guitarist I prefer half-weighted, but weighted keyboards. The
Kurzweil PC2 has got a common half-weighted keyboard that is used by
many other synth of several companies. I don't remember the name, but
IMO this is the best keyboard for synth, excepted somebody prefers
weighted, resp. original piano keyboards.
5:59 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
My DX7 does sound much better, but Hexter does.
Hm, a friend hopefully still has got his DX7 II, maybe he sold it at
Ebay. A direct comparison might be interesting.
just a quick note - I've found lots of free DX7 patches on the web,
and they load just fine into Hexter. I've really enjoyed using Hexter
much more now b/c of this.
--
Josh Lawrence
www.hardbop200.com
6:11 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
Yes, there was a great collection, which I have downloaded at the time, even
before I knew hexter and before I could upload sounds to my DX7. Marvellous
what you can get and the pure mass of them! I think there was one zip files
with 10.000 patches in all.
Keep hextering and dx7-ing on :-)
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
1 Jan
1 Jan
12:08 a.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
Now I wish I never sold my DX7 while I was short on cash in college..
-Paul
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Julien Claassen <julien(a)c-lab.de> wrote:
Yes, there was a great collection, which I have
downloaded at the time, even
before I knew hexter and before I could upload sounds to my DX7. Marvellous
what you can get and the pure mass of them! I think there was one zip files
with 10.000 patches in all.
Keep hextering and dx7-ing on :-)
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
12:31 a.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Saturday 01 January 2011 00:08:04 Paul Giblock wrote:
Now I wish I never sold my DX7 while I was short on
cash in college..
In my experience there is not a single valid reason to sell music instruments.
There are however lots of good reasons to buy instruments.
5:27 a.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold(a)arnoldarts.de> wrote:
On Saturday 01 January 2011 00:08:04 Paul Giblock
wrote:
In my experience the only valid reason to sell musical instruments is to be
able to afford to buy new musical instruments. Or something like that...
Now I wish I never sold my DX7 while I was short
on cash in college..
In my experience there is not a single valid reason to sell music
instruments.
There are however lots of good reasons to buy instruments.
3:16 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 00:27 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Saturday 01 January 2011 00:08:04 Paul Giblock
wrote:
:)
I still have got, for example, a Roland MT-32, not really a good sound
device ;), I don't use it, but I also can't sell it and by the way, the
included pseudo-analog-synth is interesting, even the side noise can be
tolerated, just editing sounds isn't that easy :(.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/05/MT_32.jpg/300px-MT_32.j…
If possible, nobody should sell, but just buy THOSE instruments, OTOH we
don't have got CV gate anymore, but instead a lot of MIDI jitter for
modern PCs.
FWIW, I'm happy that I bought a DX7 when I was jung, but a Roland JX3P,
OTOH the JX3P isn't that often emulated as a DX7 or any ARP or ...
Now I wish I never sold my DX7 while I was short
on cash in college..
In my experience there is not a single valid reason to sell music instruments.
There are however lots of good reasons to buy instruments. 
2 Jan
2 Jan
11:21 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On December 31, 2010 06:08:04 pm Paul Giblock wrote:
Now I wish I never sold my DX7 while I was short on
cash in college..
-Paul
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Julien Claassen <julien(a)c-lab.de> wrote:
> Yes, there was a great collection, which I have downloaded at the time,
> even before I knew hexter and before I could upload sounds to my DX7.
> Marvellous what you can get and the pure mass of them! I think there was
> one zip files with 10.000 patches in all.
> Keep hextering and dx7-ing on :-)
> Julien
>
> --------
> Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
Hello. Not sure where to break in here, but the MusE sequencer
has a nice DX7 emulator called Deicsonze.
It has adjustable parameter graphs and so on.
In the new MusE-2 Qt4, it was updated to a much better version.
However it is an internal MESS soft synth, so can't be used externally,
but as a workaround, MusE itself could possibly be used as the module.
Hope that helps.
Tim.
11:34 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On January 2, 2011 05:13:22 pm Tim E. Real wrote:
Hello. Not sure where to break in here, but the MusE
sequencer
has a nice DX7 emulator called Deicsonze.
It has adjustable parameter graphs and so on.
In the new MusE-2 Qt4, it was updated to a much better version.
However it is an internal MESS soft synth, so can't be used externally,
but as a workaround, MusE itself could possibly be used as the module.
Hope that helps.
Tim.
Sorry, just checked, it's actually a DX11/TX81Z emulator.
Tim.
1 Jan
1 Jan
2:53 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 10:59 -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
Happy New Year to everybody :)!
Patches for Hexter? I like Hexter as a virtual synth (, but not as a
replacement for a DX7).
To be continued within the next days ;)
Ralf
My DX7 does sound much better, but Hexter does.
Hm, a friend hopefully still has got his DX7 II, maybe he sold it at
Ebay. A direct comparison might be interesting.
just a quick note - I've found lots of free DX7 patches on the web,
and they load just fine into Hexter. I've really enjoyed using Hexter
much more now b/c of this.
31 Dec
31 Dec
6:11 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
OT: I never noticed any difference for the sound
quality, of different
versions of the Prophet 5, but I guess everybody heard about stable or
unstable tuning for different versions of the Mini Moog ;). Revisions
could have different qualities. [OT end]
There were two major releases of the Prophet-5, one with Curtis chips and
later one with SSM chips. The Curtis had rather wild temperature senstivity
and so was replaced. Anybody who has used both found the newer models
to sound a lot thinner and some would prefer the sensitivity/unreliability of
the former to get the sound quality.
The MiniMoog is a bit more esoteric, they did not used anybodies chipsets
but mostly discrete components. Legend has it they the board layout was
changed at some point and even though the design was the same those in
the know did not appreciate the new sound.
I am pretty sure the Oberheim went through the same issues as SC. The
big Rolands are a separate issue - I think they used there own chipsets but
I could be a bit wide of the mark.
Kind regards, nick.
6:59 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Nick Copeland
<nickycopeland(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
This thread reminded me I have a DX7 sitting in the garage. Wonder if
it still works? Hasn't been out of the flight case in years...
- Mark
OT: I never
noticed any difference for the sound quality, of different
versions of the Prophet 5, but I guess everybody heard about stable or
unstable tuning for different versions of the Mini Moog ;). Revisions
could have different qualities. [OT end]
There were two major releases of the Prophet-5, one with Curtis chips and
later one with SSM chips. The Curtis had rather wild temperature senstivity
and so was replaced. Anybody who has used both found the newer models
to sound a lot thinner and some would prefer the sensitivity/unreliability
of
the former to get the sound quality.
The MiniMoog is a bit more esoteric, they did not used anybodies chipsets
but mostly discrete components. Legend has it they the board layout was
changed at some point and even though the design was the same those in
the know did not appreciate the new sound.
I am pretty sure the Oberheim went through the same issues as SC. The
big Rolands are a separate issue - I think they used there own chipsets but
I could be a bit wide of the mark.
Kind regards, nick.
7:15 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
Hello Mark!
Could you give me your adress? I'm sure your garage wouldn't be too secure.
You wouldn't mind, would you? :-)
Sorry for posting nonsense, just had to, but I think you're used to it by
now.
Ducking away and kind regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
8:49 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Julien Claassen <julien(a)c-lab.de> wrote:
Hello Mark!
Could you give me your adress? I'm sure your garage wouldn't be too secure.
You wouldn't mind, would you? :-)
Sorry for posting nonsense, just had to, but I think you're used to it by
now.
Ducking away and kind regards
Julien
It's exactly the sort of nonsense that makes me continue to be a happy
member of this list
Happy New Year to you and everyone else here.
Cheers,
Mark
P.S. - I ain't that hard to find so if it ends up missing would you
mind giving me your address so the police don't have such a hard time
getting it back?!? ;-)
1 Jan
1 Jan
3:03 p.m.
New subject: DX7 (was Re: On the last eve of the year)
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 18:11 +0100, Nick Copeland wrote:
I know two releases with a little bit different design for the
potentiometers in the case.
OT: I never
noticed any difference for the sound quality, of
different
versions of the Prophet 5, but I guess everybody
heard about stable
or
unstable tuning for different versions of the
Mini Moog ;).
Revisions
could have different qualities. [OT end]
There were two major releases of the Prophet-5, one with Curtis chips
and
later one with SSM chips. The Curtis had rather wild temperature
senstivity
and so was replaced. Anybody who has used both found the newer models
to sound a lot thinner and some would prefer the
sensitivity/unreliability of
the former to get the sound quality.
The MiniMoog is a bit more esoteric, they did not used anybodies
chipsets
but mostly discrete components. Legend has it they the board layout
was
changed at some point and even though the design was the same those
in
the know did not appreciate the new sound.
I am pretty sure the Oberheim went through the same issues as SC. The
big Rolands are a separate issue - I think they used there own
chipsets but
I could be a bit wide of the mark.
Kind regards, nick.
I guess my Oberheim Matrix-1000 will use CME micro chips and I guess a
Roland Juno-106 will use CME too and perhaps SC and Moog (at least for
later synth) did use those chips too.
To be continued
Ralf
1:33 p.m.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:09:16 +0100
Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen(a)comhem.se> wrote:
It was so terribly cold. Snow was falling, and it was
almost dark.
Evening came on, the last evening of the year. In the cold and gloom a
poor little girl, bareheaded and barefoot, was walking through the
streets. Of course when she had left her house she'd had slippers on,
but what good had they been? ...
The Little Match Girl
http://mx44.linux.dk/~jens/unpublished/mtchgirl.mp3
...
"She wanted to warm herself," the people said. No one imagined what
beautiful things she had seen, and how happily she had gone with her old
grandmother into the bright New Year.
Lovely tune, and some fine playing.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
5:13 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Jens M Andreasen
<jens.andreasen(a)comhem.se> wrote:
It was so terribly cold. Snow was falling, and it was
almost dark.
Evening came on, the last evening of the year. In the cold and gloom a
poor little girl, bareheaded and barefoot, was walking through the
streets. Of course when she had left her house she'd had slippers on,
but what good had they been? ...
The Little Match Girl
http://mx44.linux.dk/~jens/unpublished/mtchgirl.mp3
...
"She wanted to warm herself," the people said. No one imagined what
beautiful things she had seen, and how happily she had gone with her old
grandmother into the bright New Year.
I quite enjoyed this. Thanks!
- Mark
5:44 p.m.
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
The Little Match Girl
http://mx44.linux.dk/~jens/unpublished/mtchgirl.mp3
Just lovely, Jens. It immediately made me think of Jean Renoir's silent
film adaptation of the story. I'd love to hear you accompany that movie.
"Please, sir, may we have another ?"
Best,
dp
7:17 p.m.
On 12/31/2010 05:44 PM, Dave Phillips wrote:
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> The Little Match Girl
> http://mx44.linux.dk/~jens/unpublished/mtchgirl.mp3
beautiful.
\r
8:27 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 11:44 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote:
It immediately made me think of Jean Renoir's
silent
film adaptation of the story.
The footage I had in mind is here:
Little Match Girl ReMake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ihqvbj7p4U
.. but it needs to be cut down and shortened - like no naughty boys in
the beginning and not so many matches.
5030
days inactive
5032
days old
linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
30 comments
14 participants
participants (14)
-
Arnold Krille -
Dave Phillips -
Folderol -
gene heskett -
Jens M Andreasen -
Josh Lawrence -
Julien Claassen -
Mark Knecht -
michael noble -
Nick Copeland -
Paul Giblock -
Ralf Mardorf -
rosea.grammostola -
Tim E. Real