Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable

Daniel James said : I agree, let's start it slowly and see how it goes. Concerning the directory structure, we use that for p:d: http://code.goto10.org/projects/puredyne/browser/live/kernel a rather simple kernel version `- config `- patches maybe good enough for now? in terms of who is pushing what to who, I would not mind dropping the kernel folder we have on our SVN and only work from one type of repos. So, that means we would push stuff directly to the/a LAT git. It doesn't make much sense to maintain 2 different type of repos for that (SVN and git). What do you think Karsten? It's gonna be a pain to move data from p:d SVN to a LAT git and back everytime we have a new config commited I think. If we need non LAT generic config, we can always have distro specific config files in another LAT git or in a subfolder, etc ... We might have to experiment for a little while anyway, until we have some workflow and structure that everyone is happy with :) a.