On 02/09/2013 04:59 AM, David L. Craig wrote:
> On 13Feb08:1918-1000, david wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/2013 05:10 AM, David L. Craig wrote:
>>> On 13Feb08:0755-0600, Stephen Stubbs wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/8/2013 1:43 AM, david wrote:
>>>>> http://visual.ly/psychology-music?utm_source=visually_embed
>>>>>
>>>> So now we have quantitative proof that the Ancient Greeks' views on
>>>> music were correct.
>>>>
>>>> Music is not an art but a science, with well defined laws that
>>>> enable the musician to induce specific effects and emotions in the
>>>> listener.
>>>
>>> So explain how Western peoples feel sad in minor keys
>>> while Middle Eastern peoples do not, just to mention
>>> one non-universal emotional reaction.
>>
>> I don't think emotional reactions are as directly connected with
>> usage of specific brain centers. As the success of cognitive therapy
>> for some problems, emotional reactions are learned. Cultures help
>> teach that, too.
>
> So then you admit your scientific laws do not enable the
> musician to induce specific effects and emotions in the
> listener.
I think you're confusing me with some other poster. The "Music is not an
art but a science" comment above is from some one else.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://clanjones.org/david/http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
Virtual MIDI Piano Keyboard is a MIDI events generator and receiver. It
doesn't produce any sound by itself, but can be used to drive a MIDI
synthesizer (either hardware or software, internal or external). You can use
the computer's keyboard to play MIDI notes, and also the mouse. You can use
the Virtual MIDI Piano Keyboard to display the played MIDI notes from
another instrument or MIDI file player.
Changes for v0.5.1:
* Fixed bug #3599827. No default keyboard shortcuts available in 0.5.0 on
fresh installations
* Qt5 build compatibility (but not fully functional)
Requirements for all platforms: CMake-2.8 and Qt-4.8 or later.
Please use the mailing list <vmpk-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net> for questions
and comments. Thanks.
Copyright (C) 2008-2013, Pedro López-Cabanillas and others
License: GPL v3
More info
http://vmpk.sourceforge.net
Downloads
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vmpk/files/vmpk/0.5.1/
Regards,
Pedro
Hi,
I was a long term jackd1 user and my first action on a new linux
installation (mostly using Ubuntu) was normally to remove pulseaudio as
it was badly configured and/or buggy. Things have changed and I really
started to like PA for everyday stuff. And then jackdbus came along
which together with the device reservation API and the jackd sinks
promised to make using these two things together more easy. This mostly
works fine, except for the device reservation bug in PA which is easy to
work around though:
- Make sure no audio process is actively using the soundcard you want
jackd to use
- Run pulseaudio -k
- Run jack_control start
I have noticed some issues with jackdbus though:
a] jack_control start sometimes doesn't work at all after the first time
it failed to aquire the device. A killall -9 jackdbus is in order to
restore it
b] after some hours of operation jackdbus starts to eat 100% cpu on two
of my four cores.
Are these known issues? I use Ubuntu 12.10 and jackd:
fps@mango 12:08:21 .../Games/Xonotic/ $ jackd -v
jackdmp 1.9.9
[...]
How to diagnose the 100% cpu thing more closely? The
~.log/jack/jackdbus.log shows nothing suspicious.
Thanks and regards,
Flo
--
Florian Paul Schmidt
http://fps.io
On Sat, February 9, 2013 1:48 am, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was a long term jackd1 user and my first action on a new linux
> installation (mostly using Ubuntu) was normally to remove pulseaudio as
> it was badly configured and/or buggy. Things have changed and I really
> started to like PA for everyday stuff. And then jackdbus came along
> which together with the device reservation API and the jackd sinks
> promised to make using these two things together more easy. This mostly
> works fine, except for the device reservation bug in PA which is easy to
> work around though:
>
> - Make sure no audio process is actively using the soundcard you want
> jackd to use
> - Run pulseaudio -k
> - Run jack_control start
There is a real fix in the pipe line... not sure when it will get into
releases. I find:
pasuspender --sleep 5 & ; jack_control start
Will allow me to start jackdbus even while pulse is streaming. Actually I
use pasuspender from qjackctl to do the same thing.
> I have noticed some issues with jackdbus though:
>
> a] jack_control start sometimes doesn't work at all after the first time
> it failed to aquire the device. A killall -9 jackdbus is in order to
> restore it
jack_control exit works for me. This is part of the bug above, when
jackdbus fails to get the device, the jackd part dies but the dbus part
doesn't (it seems, I don't know the code well enough) It would be
interesting to compare this behaviour with jackd2.
> b] after some hours of operation jackdbus starts to eat 100% cpu on two
> of my four cores.
I have left jackdbus running for at least 5 days and have not seen this
show up. PA has been used during that time (audacious and fire fox) as
well as other jack clients. I would be interested to know if running jackd
instead of jackdbus is the same or different.
There are some patches on the way for jack2 in ubuntu as well. (in testing)
>
> Are these known issues? I use Ubuntu 12.10 and jackd:
>
> fps@mango 12:08:21 .../Games/Xonotic/ $ jackd -v
> jackdmp 1.9.9
> [...]
I am using the alpha 13.04 on this machine and 12.04 on another.
joe@studio1304:~$ jackd -v
jackdmp 1.9.9.4
The plan is that once the jackd patches are tested they will be SRU to
12.04 and 12.10.
--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
Does anyone have any experience of using a MIDI-over-USB dumb keyboard?
Does it need special drivers or can I just plug it in and have it automatically
found by my machine?
I'm hoping to be able to use Yoshimi on my netbook at an impromptu gig.
I'm running a cut-down debian, but will get qjackctl from the repository (which
usually fetches and configures everything else I need.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Are there any advantages to using 96k (or 48k?) if the final target is
44.1k/16bit? I am thinking that tracking at 44.1k / 24 bit should be
more than sufficient for most (non-pro) purposes?
I read somewhere about higher bitrate being important for headroom for
audio processing plugins, but does samplerate also have an effect on
this?
James