>} To be the quintesential dumb bunny again...So on MDK, I would use
>} Kpackage to install MDK rpm's only? Or could I use .deb or RH or what
>} ever other packages to install to my MDK system? I know this is a
>} stretch even as I write it. But I've written it....and what is written
>} must be ........sent!
>
> I don't know... I think Mandrake's pretty particular. You can't escape all of
>the Mandrake rpms on the net though... I doubt you'd have a problem.
>
>
>
Is it even possible to download a Mandrake RPM?
Every time I try to download an audio package from a Mandrake repository
it complains that I don't have the necessary dependency packages
installed on my internet machine, and asks me to insert one of more of
the Mandrake 9.2 discs into my cdrom drive. After installing packages I
don't really want on my internet machine, I click on the download link
and it *INSTALLS* the package I want to put on my audio machine at home
on my internet machine. YUCK.
Is there any way to download these packages so I can burn them to a CD
and bring them home to my audio machine? Or maybe repackage them from
the installed copy?
My audio machine at home is not on the internet, and never will be due
to the presence of unreleased audio tracks - no network connection is
the most reliable firewall ever created.
Evey time I move a desktop machine I always have trouble getting it back
up and running again. I have quite a few friends who do this regularly,
but they have custom built machines in shock mounted cases (as my next
one will be; my current machines are rebuilt slavage in commercial cases).
e. j. branagan
The MUSE - Nashville, TN
>> I think one other issue is wave cancelation but I'm
>> not so sure about this. Assume a 12 foot long room
>> with source against one wall. Cancelation will occur
>> where the waves meet which is at six feet. So, you
>> don't want to locate the mixing chair in the
>> cancelation zone.
>>
> <SNIP>
> Very true, actually, assuming you have a frequency that is a multiple
> of the room length.
>
Wall to wall reflections tend to disperse.
Most room resonences are corner to corner (in a box-like room).
Sound behaves a lot like light in a three-way right angle corner -
It comes back out the same direction it went in, just like those
three way mirrors they use to reflect laser beams back from the moon.
Most studios these days try to avoid any right-angle corners.
e. j. branagan
The MUSE - Nashville, TN
Hi everybody,
first of all thanks for your answers to my previous posts.
Now that I'm having fun playing around with a bass guitar and ecasound,
I'm thinking about buying an old laptop to use during rehersals and
maybe gigs. I'm wondering what kind of hardware would do the trick. I'm
kind of broke so the older (i.e. cheaper) the better (it would just run
a shell, a tweaked kernel, JACK and FX processing stuff).
I guess I may run into problems with obsolete sound cards (an area I'm
not much knowledgeable in) and probably other issues I don't know about
yet...
Anybody has any experience/knowledge to share ? What would be the
absolute minimum requirement for you ?
btw, I'm also wondering about vibrations damaging the hardware,
particularly the HD (the box would sit on top of a bass amp, or at least
not so far from it) What do you think about it ?
Thanks for taking the time to read this.
OK, we've had a lot of good discussion about good studio headphones.
How about good headphones for live multitrack recording in a very loud room.
Good isolation and relatively high volume.
e. j. branagan
The MUSE - Nashville, TN
Florin Andrei:
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 06:55, Dave Griffiths wrote:
>> Before the gig I went through my cron jobs commenting them all out just in
>> case. slocate is particually annoying - I guess most people disable this
>> anyway - even with jack using such a large buffer, all the disk access caused
>> problems.
>
>slocate is always among the first packages i remove after installing a
>system. Have no use for it, and it is very annoying.
I do a more general approach; turn off all cron-jobs if anyone is logged
in.
After installation, this script is run:
"
if grep "run-parts " >/dev/null /etc/crontab ; then
cp -f /etc/crontab /etc/crontab.org
sed s/run-parts\ /run-parts2\ / </etc/crontab.org >/etc/crontab
echo "crontab changed"
fi
if grep "run-parts " >/dev/null /etc/anacrontab ; then
cp -f /etc/anacrontab /etc/anacrontab.org
sed s/run-parts\ /run-parts2\ / </etc/anacrontab.org >/etc/anacrontab
echo "anacrontab changed"
fi
"
and /usr/bin/run-parts2 looks like this:
"
#!/bin/bash
if ! ps -A |grep ssh-agent ; then
run-parts $@
fi
"
At least this works for fedora core 1. Don't know about other
distributions.
--
I rebuilt the latest Fedora 2 kernel update to enable preempt and
IO-APIC.
I'm not yet sure about preempt, but IO-APIC has been acting weird.
It gave me more interrupts (up to 21 instead of 15), but the devices
were distributed suboptimal.
Without APIC, the nvidia module was alone on its own interrupt, the
EMU10K1 was alone, the ide and eth modules were on separate interrupts,
etc. Quite ok.
With IO-APIC, nvidia, EMU10K1 and bttv were on the same interrupt, ide2,
ide3 and eth0 were on the same interrupt.
Instead of messing with the kernel again, i just rebooted with the
"noapic" parameter and now the interrupts are looking good again.
BTW, anyone has any measurements on how bad it is to put essential
devices on the same interrupt? (in terms of xruns)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/