I think the idea of having an agenda is a good idea. Otherwise, when people come - there is nothing there, but just people sitting with their laptops.

If there is an agenda, there is something to look forward to.

Another idea - is that we can actually record our meetings. And then post it here, for other people to listen to the sessions. I can bring my Zoom recorder and always record. We can even do videos, too.





On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:56 PM, <holger@dehnhardt.org> wrote:
6. Juli 2017 15:29, "Daniel Swärd" <excds@kth.se> schrieb:

> On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 17:41 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
>
>> On 07/05/2017 01:05 PM, Daniel Swärd wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'm once again hoping that we might get some people to the Linux
>> Audio
>> Berlin meeting. I'll be in the mainhall at c-base (Rungestraße 20)
>> from
>> 20:00.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Thanks for the reminder. I can't make it tonight, but I've put the
>> August 2nd down.
>
> So, should we (if trying also to get some more people (yesterday I was
> the only one showing up...)) maybe have an agenda or some discussion
> topics to have it a little bit more organized?
>
> - New software to try out?
> - Old software that people should not forget?
> - A jam session in the soundlab?
>
> What do you think?
>
> /Daniel
>

Hi Daniel and others,

I would like to talk about others experiences with session management: Jack session, non session manager and ladish (the on I use) . In my opinion this is one of the outstanding features of Linux audio but are there a lot of peaople using it?
And why are they only supported by a small amount of applications?

I will not be there in August as I'm on holidays, but would like to see this as a topic in September?


Holger
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



--