2009/9/18 Dave Phillips <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:dlphillips@woh.rr.com">dlphillips@woh.rr.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div class="im">Ray Rashif wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; JACK1 is definitely more reliable than JACK2, as some plug-ins<br>
&gt; (notably VST ones) may fail to launch/run properly. But this is<br>
&gt; negligible, and not a factor at all if your system is native.<br>
&gt;<br>
</div>Good to know. The production box stays native, but I&#39;ll stick with JACK1<br>
for now.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In case I was vague, I didn&#39;t imply that it should be avoided! JACK2 is simply great with regards to performance ;) <br></div>