Hi Q,
Ok I admit that the description of the area is very vague. The area is from 02:31 to 03:47. And your right, expressiveness is not loudness.
So let me say more temperamentful, as this also includes the control of tempo. But hearing it again (for the fourth time), forget what I said, it's just great.
Regards,
Gerald
On Do, 2012-04-12 at 20:48 +0100, Q wrote: 
Hi Gerald

Thanks for listening and commenting and I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Personally, I wouldn't call it masterfully played because the 
microdynamics were not to my liking as I'm not a good enough player to 
have adequate control over them. However, the gross dynamics are to my 
liking and achieve what I set out to achieve. It's probably just a 
slightly poor choice of words, but I'd take issue with equating loudness 
with being expressive, or lower volumes as lacking expressiveness.

Although, to be fair, I'm guessing at the vague area that you're 
referring to, because it wasn't clear -- a time index would have been 
more useful.

Thanks again.

Cheers

Q

On 12/04/12 20:00, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
> Hello Q,
> All in all a very good piece and masterfully played. So my criticism is
> on a high level: I would try to play way more expressive, forte than
> piano from about 2/3rds of the piece. I believe at that point you play a
> C^7/C# chord . From that point on I would play harder until the
> F_minor^(#7) chord, then go soft again. (I'm using latex-style here:
> F_(something) is F subscript something and F^(something) is F
> superscript something ). hope you get my point.
> But again: Very well done , I listened to it 3 times in a row!
> Regards,
> Gerald
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user