2011/5/30 Simon Wise <simonzwise(a)gmail.com>
Just use testing/wheezy, there's no need to face with the unstable release
bugs or with the "vintage" stability
when you have the mid choice. IMHO
testing[wheezy] is quite similar to unstable[sid] generally ... things get
a bit more lively around the release time for a new stable when testing is
frozen for six months before the new release, then becomes the new release,
then changes rapidly as all the backlog moves in. experimental also exists
and has had things like ardour3 on it sometimes, packages or versions that
are not in sid but are tests or alternatives being tried out before being
moved into sid.
Sid is more useful than testing if what you want from your system is a
system that matches the system that the packagers are using to prepare new
packages, in particular if you want to be able to use the packages that the
multimedia maintainers are making. That list has been growing rapidly for
the last year or so.
Simon.
About testing
*[...] That means that things should not break as badly as in unstable or
experimental distributions, because packages are allowed to enter this
distribution only after a certain period of time has passed, and when they
don't have any release-critical bugs filed against them*.
Experimental has ardour2 on it sometimes? I really don't think so :-)
regards
-r
--
*L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata
all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti, alla
protesta violenta e viscerale.*