Bristol looks grand, everything is layed out before you on a single screen (for nearly all the synths) and it functions fine. Zynaddsubfx on the other hand.... Quite complex, but very flexible.
But comparing the looks of a synth to a sequencer? lol wut?!

Andrew

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear fons, perhaps. It is, after all, a matter of taste. I like Qtractor GUI a lot,
it is inspiring. But I like Wired too, to be honest.


On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:01 PM, <fons@kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 09:25:32AM +0100, James Stone wrote:

> I think you hit the nail on the head - the graphics are really nice on
> wired - unlike most of the other linux apps (with possible exception
> of bristol, renoise etc.)

/me looks. ? ?? ??? IMHO it looks 'cheap plastic', and surely
not as any piece of HW I'd trust. Lots of ugly and completely
disfunctionalo eye candy.

Qtractor looks at least 30 dB better to me, as does Renoise.

Ciao,

--
Je veux que la mort me trouve plantant mes choux, mais
nonchalant d’elle, et encore plus de mon jardin imparfait.
(Michel de Montaigne)
_______________________________________________



--

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user