2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:schivmeister@gmail.com">schivmeister@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it suits a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Oops, forgot to continue:<br></div><div><br></div><div>For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their cons. Google and you&#39;ll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 come up ahead of the others.</div>