On Monday, May 4, 2015, Ivan K &lt;<a href="mailto:ivan_521521@yahoo.com">ivan_521521@yahoo.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I have some question regarding versions of Ardour<br>
that people are using.<br>
<br>
Currently, I am running Fedora 20, and their<br>
software repository has two versions of Ardour available:<br>
<br>
ardour-2.8.16-12.fc20<br>
ardour-3.5.403-1.fc20<br>
<br>
I seem to recall that in the past, despite<br>
Ardour3 being available, some people were still preferring<br>
to use Ardour2.  This seems to be supported by the<br>
fact that Fedora offers both versions.<br>
<br>
Why might one prefer Ardour2 over Ardour3?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think some people stayed with A2 just because it was working well for them and didn&#39;t want to run risks or change their workflow. </div><div><br></div><div>Now that a more robust Ardour 4 is out, I guess usage of A2 will decrease even more. I would not recommend anyone to install A2 or A3 nowadays. It may take a while for A4 to arrive at official Fedora, Ubuntu etc repos, but in the meantime you can get it directly from <a href="http://ardour.org">ardour.org</a> (KXStudio repositories for Ubuntu users already have A4). </div><div><br></div><div>Bruno<span></span></div><div></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Thanks<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-audio-user mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org&#39;)">Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user" target="_blank">http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user</a><br>
</blockquote>