Ok, that will explain it.

I'm using jack applications, like Hydrogen, Rosegarden, Ardour, and none of them is lash-ed, i believe.

thanks,

Lobo

Dragan Noveski wrote: 
Ricardo Lobo wrote:
  
Hi People,

I have two questions, or maybe we can call it, surveys.

First: Is there anyone here who uses LASH? I tried it but I didn’t 
found it useful, am I missing something?

    
hallo, for me lash is running good for muse, seq24, specimen and glashctl
the problem that i see is that not that much jack clients are lash-ed.

cheers,
doc
  
Second: Yesterday I was told to try the OSS V4.0, because it is – or 
so I was told – better than ALSA. It goes against what I think to be 
the common opinion around here.

Thanks,

Lobo

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
  
    

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user