Scott Ecker wrote:
> david wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> I see people on the list running much lower latencies than 64msec, and
>> seemingly trying to get even lower ...
>>
>
> You can't punch-in at 64ms and expect it to sound good. At 4ms it's
> seamless, literally.
>
>
Indeed. I think the ll issue is of real importance when recording. At 64
ms multitrack recording/playback is a not very satisfying experience.
Best,
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user