Hi
Am Tue, 09. Nov 2010 um 11:57:29 +0100 schrieb torbenh:
Torben,
> > Awesome!
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:49:46PM +1100, Leigh Dyer wrote:
[...]
your posting is confusing. Most probably Leigh is not acountable for
> i dont see the transport synchronisation working with a jack1 svn version.
> you are still using only a sync callback.
your complains and I am not sure they are addressed to me, but I will
give a comment anyway.
First _I_ will surely not use "sync callback", in best case seq24 will.
Second _I_ do not rely on transport via software.
> and you are relying on the transport to go through the
> JackTransportStarting state.
Pardon, who is "we"? I can not recall such kind of agreement and I
> this issue should be fixed.
> iirc we came to the conclusion, that seq24 is broken, and we will not
> revert the changes in jack, which break it.
certainly do not know anything about changes going on in jack svn.
[...]
I was not aware of this patch, searching the devel mailing list history
> the patch for jack-session support didnt get merged either.
today I found your patch dating from March when I was busy doing other
things. I recommend to verify a little bit earlyer wheather your
contributions get in or not and to attrack attention about important
changes.
Guido
PS: Please do _not_ CC me for "list replys", this is annoying
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkzZuyUACgkQk6cKJms5yBvMbQCdH77LxK6nqb7wrA0FH1eKpjQN
+ssAn0isb9ATyyBZSHsHcyzjW9xxlBUw
=LGV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user