Quite honestly, it does not seem to be something that _should_ be done by
On Sun, December 30, 2012 7:12 pm, Devin Anderson wrote:
>
> JACK *could* deal with this issue, but:
>
> 1.) It would be better if the functionality was independent of JACK.
> 2.) I don't think the issue is JACK's responsibility.
ALSA either, because properly joining two devices would mean an extra
buffer (and latency).
It seems that the reality is that each device needs
to be dealt with as a separate device. So if it is not Jack's problem then
a second jacklike server that exposes the ports as jack clients is needed
and expected. So using something like zita-a2j would be the "correct" way
of doing things.