On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Chris Bannister
<cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote:
> 48Khz will not help at all when it comes to artifacts and the raw
> material is usually in 44.1 (and sometimes in 96 or 192) anyway.
> Speaking about bitrates higher than what the human ear can hear,
> here is some cool info about high bit rates:
>
>
http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
link, just the subject.)
highly controversial in the way that, say, climate change or evolutuon is highly controversial.
on one side, we have a group of people dedicated to measurement, reproduceable results, correct testing methodology, science.
on the other side, we have a group of people dedicated to woo.
that isn't a controversy, it's the endless scream of the stupid in the face of the truth.