2009/9/26 drew Roberts <zotz@100jamz.com>
I don't know if I like it or not as I was not speaking to the particular issueOn Friday 25 September 2009 16:56:12 Ray Rashif wrote:
> 2009/9/25 drew Roberts <zotz@100jamz.com>
>
> > On Thursday 24 September 2009 22:39:58 Ray Rashif wrote:
> > > Even if he does not, he has the
> > > right to determine how his software should be used, what should be
> >
> > patched,
> >
> > > what should be improved.
> >
> > Ah... What?!!! The right? (As in it some how has some bearing on us and
> > our rights as users of that same software and our rights to determine
> > such things
> > for ourselves?) Please explain your thinking here. I can see such
> > thinking from the non-Free world, but not sure how what I see being said
> > fits in the Free world. (So perhaps I am seeing something that was not
> > said...??
> >
> > all the best,
> >
> > drew
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-audio-user mailing list
> > Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
> Uhh..no. He has the right in his domain. A third-party has his rights as
> well, and that's when it's called a "fork" :) So let me simplify:
>
> You don't like it, then take it your way.
>
> We're lucky our devs are friendly. Well, most of them.
at hand but to the general.
Below modded a bit for layour purposes:
Within any developer's copy of their code, I agree with the second two, but
"Even if he does not, he has the right to determine:
how his software should be used,
what should be patched,
what should be improved."
the right to determine how it should be used once in the hands of users? (If
that is what you meant, I don't think I agree with that. If you meant
something else, another clarification would be appreciated.
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user