Is JavaScript so bad?  Why turn it off?  I am happy to have it on all the time and the worries are much less under Linux.  It's not Java or ActiveX after all.

On 1 October 2011 10:34, Arve Barsnes <arve.barsnes@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1 October 2011 08:53, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@libero.it> wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 04:14 AM, Ken Restivo wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 03:00:02AM +0200, Peter Crighton wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello list,
>>> I just wanted to let you know that I started a new blog about
>>> Recording on Linux: http://linux-recording.blogspot.com/
>>> The first entry (well, not counting the introduction here) is about
>>> using the Analogue Drums Big Mono drumkit with Hydrogen. Let me know
>>> what you think about the blog, any constructive criticism is much
>>> appreciated!
>>>
>>
>> *sigh*, Google, doesn't anyone use HTML anymore?
>>
>> This is what that website looks like with JavaScript turned off:
>>
>> http://storage.restivo.org/misc/blogger.jpg
>>
>> I'm sure it's a fantastic blog, but, I dunno what Google has done to it.
>
> If truth be told it seems a problem with this particular blog (which by the
> way seems a very cool idea ;) - other blogspot blogs seem to work with
> JavaScript turned off.
>
> I'm not a blogger user so I'm not sure what google puts in when you create a
> blog and what it leaves to the user. Maybe, the massive use of JavaScript
> comes in for recently created ones?
>
> That said. Yes it seems that google is pushing more and more for the use of
> JavaScript see e.g.
> http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/05/no-javascript-no-google-navigation.html
>
It seems that, without allowing javascript from blogblog.com this
particular blog doesn't work at all. Is that also owned by Google?

Arve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user