On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:25:08 -0400, Tim wrote: > On 10/07/2018 04:45 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 17:36 -0400, Tim wrote: >>> On 10/06/2018 03:51 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>>> https://www.roland.com/us/products/gkc-5_10/ >>> >>> Most folks become aware that even the best quality single-conductor >>> (with shield ground) 1/4" guitar cables eventually break. It >>> happens to all of them. Usually at the entry point to the plug, or >>> in the plug itself. >> >> Hi, >> >> I confirm this and most likely anybody else does, too. >> >>> Now take that hard-learned experience with a single-conductor cable >>> and apply it to *thirteen* conductors. Guess what happens... >>> >>> (Jacks for these DIN type plugs are usually never a problem if >>> secured and soldered properly. Usually far less trouble than >>> other types of jacks.) >>> >>> Often, the cause of the cable's break is the plug's strain relief >>> being too tight - ironically the very thing that is supposed >>> to help prevent breakage in the first place. >>> >>> I can't be too harsh on this product for the price/weight range. >>> But yeah, buy TWO of them to be safe. >> >> Hi, >> >> the reason that I like to get more information about this Roland >> cable is, that there are a lot of less expensive 13 pin DIN cables >> available by the Internet and I do not only need a backup cable, I >> also want to get a shorter cable than those sold by Roland. >> >> Some of the non-Roland cables seem to be without a locking mechanism, >> but other provide a locking mechanism, e.g. the CD changer cables. I >> wonder about the used cables. Are all cable cores of the original >> Roland cable audio cables or are the cores a mix of different kind >> of cables? Do other 13-pin DIN cables provide the same pin to pin >> connection as the Roland cable? Since we know that some elChepo >> audio cables are ok for 50 cm short cables, but 3 m long cables >> worsen sound quality, while more expensive cables are still ok for >> cables way longer than 3 m, I wonder what 13-pole cables are good >> and which are bad. When using the Roland cable for the "normal" >> guitar pickups, too, the sound quality of the audio signal from the >> "normal" pickups is good. Unfortunately there is no printing on the >> Roland cables. If I want to build my own cables, what cables and >> what jacks might be good? >> >> My favoured electronic part dealer provides only one 13-pin din jack >> that fits, it's without locking mechanism and seemingly an elCheapo. >> The dealer calls it "monitor plug" and yes, my Atari SM124 has got a >> 13-pin din jack without locking mechanism, too. The dealer seems not >> to sell any 13 cores cables at all. >> >> Ordering jacks and cable from perhaps different dealers + time >> exposure might not be worth the effort, to build a non-Roland cable, >> but perhaps ordering a CD changer cable could be a solution to >> replace an original Roland cable. >> >> Regards, >> Ralf > > Hm, I'm seeing wildly varying prices for the cables on ebay. > The originals seem... a little over-priced. > I can see why you'd be shopping around, I would too :-) > Best advice I would say is read any user reviews accompanying them, > since they seem to be from people who actually use them for this > specific purpose. > > Usually I wouldn't worry about the locking mech, but in this case > since one end goes into the guitar that would be important. > Most of the ones I'm seeing appear to have the lock. > > Be sure to only look at ones that are for this Roland-compatible > purpose. Other cables may be 13 pins but they may not be > pin-compatible, and even if they are, the wires and shield may > not be a good thickness, insulation, stiffness etc. > Especially those CD changer cables, may not be the right thing. > In those, some of the wires may be individually shielded which > carry audio, and the other wires may be just control signals, > so it's not really the right thing. > > Randomly selected, this one for example promises to be pretty good: > https://www.ebay.com/itm/usa-seller-LOCKING-13-PIN-CABLE-SYNTH-ROLAND-GKC-3… > > I was going to talk about the GKC wires carrying raw, weak un-buffered > signals from the pickup... but it turns out that's *not* true ! > Looky here, I found a schematic of the GK2/3 at the top of this page: > https://www.vguitarforums.com/smf/index.php?topic=73.0 > And here is the VG-88 service manual: > https://elektrotanya.com/roland_vg-88_sm.pdf/download.html > > According to those diagrams, the cable carries power, > and *buffered* signals, and some up/down switches and > volume control signals. > > Therefore, some of the wires (the six pickup signals) might be > individually shielded and the others not, with a master shield > ground surrounding the whole lot. > Thus the cable core itself may be a special cable not easily > found to buy. But I'm not sure, possibly a normal 13-conductor > cable would actually be OK since the signals are buffered.

Thank you Tim :) it was my profession to solder professional audio gear, but that time I had eyes like gimlets and used professional soldering stations. Nowadays, with reading glasses, an elChepo magnifier (no professional magnifying spectacles) and several good soldering irons (but no soldering station, let alone hot air), I dislike to solder such jacks. If possible I'm in favour of buying a ready to use cable of that kind and 3 m (10 foot) is exactly what I'm looking for. I will continue to search myself, since shipping costs make several alternative cables as expensive as an original Roland cable. However, your hints helped a lot :). Again, thank you very much for the pointers. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user