[LAD] ladspa qa?

[Lars Luthman]

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 12:23 +0200, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> hi all,
> 
> i'm not really familiar with the ladspa development process, but is
> there any quality assurance for ladspa plugins?
> 
> i have been implementing some of my filters as ladspa plugins, but when
> trying to compare them with others, i found, that some of the plugins
> did not do, what i expected them to do (a white noise generator did not
> generate white noise, a shelf filter was highly unstable when changing
> parameters) ...
> 
> of course, all plugins are free (as in speech), without any warranty,
> but i still think, that there should be a certain amount of quality
> assurance, if we want people to use the ladspa plugins ...

It's not just LADSPA plugins:
http://osdir.com/ml/audio.jackit/2003-02/msg00202.html

That message is from 2003, but I don't think the situation has improved
dramatically since then.


--ll
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/attachments/20070904/c89cea73/attachment.pgp>