[LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1

[torbenh]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:38:38AM -0800, James Warden wrote:
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 1/26/10, Chris Cannam <cannam at all-day-breakfast.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Chris Cannam <cannam at all-day-breakfast.com>
> > Subject: Re: [LAD] tschack ... early version of smp enabled jack1
> > To: "torbenh" <torbenh at gmx.de>
> > Cc: linux-audio-dev at lists.linuxaudio.org
> > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 7:38 AM
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM,
> > torbenh <torbenh at gmx.de>
> > wrote:
> > > since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a
> > feature freeze,
> > > i added some features.
> > >
> > > - smp aware
> > > - clickless connections
> > 
> > Is there any reason why a user would prefer this over
> > jack2?
> > 
> 
> and would I assume correctly that one of the reasons to not let the jack1 codebase "die" (or freeze)  is that it is written in C as opposed to jack2 ?

no. i actually prefer C++
but not that much that i would deal with CamelCase and a class hierarchy
i find confusing. but thats just my taste. 


-- 
torben Hohn