[LAU] Gnome-shell | Unity

Folderol folderol at ukfsn.org
Sun Jun 26 19:36:15 UTC 2011


On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:23:28 -0400
Joe Hartley <jh at brainiac.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:06:40 +0200
> rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 06/26/2011 02:54 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > > The downside for OpenBox (not xmonad) is that it seems not very
> > > actively developed in the last year or so, not much releases or even
> > > git commits.
> > You could try Fluxbox instead. That project is still pretty active afaik.
> 
> Fluxbox is Openbox's successor and is still in very active development.
> I like it a lot and use it on all my machines, not just the studio 
> machine.  I've never had a problem running either gnome or kde apps
> under it.
> 

I rather think OpenBox achieved what it set out to do - be a fast, light,
highly configurable window manager - so apart from bug fixes what development
would be needed?

I find it ideal.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.


More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list